opening up such evidence could be an <a href="http://jgfqmoog.com">&qasa;emburrtosment"</a> to the president and anyway, it should be Congress that would call for impeachment of a sitting president"This judge is a class A "O-hole". First of all, Lakin isn't calling for his impeachment. Second, how does she know opening evidence could be an embarrassment for the president. Does she know what is in them ? If so, how did she know ? Has she been having ex parte communications with the administration ? Isn't that improper for a judge ?

トップ   新規 一覧 単語検索 最終更新   ヘルプ   最終更新のRSS